Skip to content
Kiklis Law Firm PLLC.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Bio
  • News / Insights
  • Contact Us
ร—
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Bio
  • News / Insights
  • Contact Us

Clarity on Alice’s step one: GoTV Streaming v. Netflix

By Michael Kiklis | 02/09/2026

The Federal Circuit today gave us some nice clarity on step one of Alice’s patentable subject matter analysis under 35 U.S.C. ยง 101 in GoTV Streaming v. Netflix. I plan on emphasizing this case in my articles, webinars, and speeches.

GoTV v. Netflix postDownload
Posted in Uncategorized and tagged patentable subject matter

Recent Posts

  • TJTM Tech. v. Google: Functional Claims Directed to Suppressing Cell Phone Notifications While Driving Found Patent Ineligible
  • RFC Lenders of Texas v. Smart Chemical Solutions: Functional Claims Directed to Monitoring Vehicles for Unauthorized Usage Fail to Recite Patentable Subject Matter
  • Constellation Designs v. LG Electronics: Result-Oriented Claims Die via ยง 101 While Detailed Claims Survive
  • Summarize, Analogize, and Euthanize (SAE): the Federal Circuit’s standard patentable-subject-matter process.
  • Another patentable-subject-matter take down by the Electric Power Group (EPG) line of cases!

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Subscribe!
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
  • 1800 Diagonal Rd., Suite 600
    Alexandria, Virginia 22314

  • (703) 647-6205

  • mike@kiklislaw.com

  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Bio
  • News / Insights
  • Contact Us

ยฉ 2026, Kiklis Law Firm PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

GoDaddy Web Design
Scroll To Top