Uncategorized
USPTO-Fed. Circ. Split Complicates Machine Learning Patents
Here is my article as published today by IP360.
Read MoreFederal Circuit Reverses District Court’s Patent Ineligibility Finding in Ceiva Opco, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Machine Learning Goes 0 for 3 on Patent Eligibility at the Federal Circuit in Dental Monitoring v. Align Tech.
Patentable Subject Matter Masterclass Webinar on August 6.
The next installment of my continuing webinar series on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (since 2014) will take place on August 6. Due to popular demand, this is the fourth webinar this year. This webinar will be a masterclass where we will cover the Federal Circuit caselaw’s nuances, inconsistencies, and outlier cases as well as the conflicts…
Read More“[A] rich and elaborate corpus of Section 101 precedent” is how the Federal Circuit describes its patentable subject matter caselaw in Etison, LLC v. HighLevel, Inc.
Honored to be quoted in today’s IAM article on the PTAB’s new precedential decision, Light & Wonder v. Evolution Malta
https://www.iam-media.com/article/squires-opens-new-ptab-escape-route-patent-owners-in-parallel-litigation
Read MorePatent Eligibility of Machine Learning
I’m providing some of my slides from my webinar yesterday on the patent eligibility of machine learning. These slides include an updated list of abstract ideas found by the Federal Circuit as well as the slides for the Electric Power Group (EPG) line of cases. The EPG section includes Recentive, RPI, and Ollnova, which is…
Read MoreHonored to be quoted in today’s IAM article about Ollnova
https://www.iam-media.com/article/inform-jury-of-abstract-idea-step-two-of-alice-says-us-federal-circuit
Read MoreArendi S.A.R.L. v. Oath Holdings Inc., et al.: Another Victim of Electric Power Group
In Arendi v. Oath Holdings (nonprecedential), the Federal Circuit today struck down four patents using Electric Power Group (EPG). Interestingly, the district court had found three patents (the ‘356, ‘854, and ‘993 patents) invalid for reciting patent ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and one patent (the ‘843 patent) as satisfying § 101.…
Read More